GOT-Torque
is
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,284
Pics of the RV275 pistons shown below...
Specifics:
Ordered grade "A" pistons
1310 grams each (bare)
4.011" diameter skirt
2.411" diam bowl
0.419" down to first ring
0.669" down to second ring
1.314" down to oil ring
48 cc bowl
0.710" deep bowl (deepest portion)
0.112" ring gaps
The bowl is 3cc bigger than my HO pistons I'm replacing. It seems to be the same size bowl as a SO piston? However, when I put the first piston/rod assembly in the engine, the piston protrudes 0.035" at TDC from the block (block was only decked 0.005") Not sure what a stock piston protrudes, but it couldn't have been this much or my stock compression ratio would have to extremely high...
Using the following numbers: (feel free to comment on these)
bore = 4.02
stroke = 4.72
compressed headgasket thickness = 0.060
combustion chamber (cc's) = 5.65 (calculated from recession of valves 1.445 diameter space 0.050" deep for each valve)
piston dome (cc's) = 48
piston deck height = -0.035
C/R is 17.68 :badidea:
If I mill the pistons 0.040", it also reduces the bowl by 3cc's, so using a deck height of 0.005 and bowl of 45, C/R is 16.3, with a .020 over gasket it is 15.4.
If I mill 0.060", reduce bowl by 4.5cc, C/R is 15.68, with a 0.020 over gasket is 14.82.
My concern is that to reach my reduced compression of around 15:1 I had to reduce the bowl to a smaller than stock size. Originally I went with the RV275 pistons thinking one advantage was alot bigger bowl (more room for fuel/air). I didn't think it would protrude so much farther than stock. Adding space above the piston outside the bowl isn't really the best place for it...
Should I even worry about it?
Specifics:
Ordered grade "A" pistons
1310 grams each (bare)
4.011" diameter skirt
2.411" diam bowl
0.419" down to first ring
0.669" down to second ring
1.314" down to oil ring
48 cc bowl
0.710" deep bowl (deepest portion)
0.112" ring gaps
The bowl is 3cc bigger than my HO pistons I'm replacing. It seems to be the same size bowl as a SO piston? However, when I put the first piston/rod assembly in the engine, the piston protrudes 0.035" at TDC from the block (block was only decked 0.005") Not sure what a stock piston protrudes, but it couldn't have been this much or my stock compression ratio would have to extremely high...
Using the following numbers: (feel free to comment on these)
bore = 4.02
stroke = 4.72
compressed headgasket thickness = 0.060
combustion chamber (cc's) = 5.65 (calculated from recession of valves 1.445 diameter space 0.050" deep for each valve)
piston dome (cc's) = 48
piston deck height = -0.035
C/R is 17.68 :badidea:
If I mill the pistons 0.040", it also reduces the bowl by 3cc's, so using a deck height of 0.005 and bowl of 45, C/R is 16.3, with a .020 over gasket it is 15.4.
If I mill 0.060", reduce bowl by 4.5cc, C/R is 15.68, with a 0.020 over gasket is 14.82.
My concern is that to reach my reduced compression of around 15:1 I had to reduce the bowl to a smaller than stock size. Originally I went with the RV275 pistons thinking one advantage was alot bigger bowl (more room for fuel/air). I didn't think it would protrude so much farther than stock. Adding space above the piston outside the bowl isn't really the best place for it...
Should I even worry about it?