Advertisement |
|
|
|
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
|
04-05-2018, 02:29 PM
|
#1
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Start From Scratch Engine Build - Advice/Opinions?
After quite some time of looking on and off, I found and purchased a cheap 2006 F350 4X4 with a 6.0 and ZF6. Now it is time to start piecing together an engine build.
What I have to work with:
1 12V block
1 24V block (post 53 block)
1 low hour 12V head
1 80K mile 24V head (on a broken 53 block)
3 5.9 cranks
5 12V rods
12 24v rods
VE pump gearcase and injector lines
P pump gearcase and injector lines
Air compressor to go in place of vacuum pump
I will need:
Head studs
Pump
Injectors
Cam & Lifters
Pistons
Gasket set
My goal is to achieve maximum fuel economy, street-ability, tow-ability, and low end torque with a byproduct of 400 or so HP.
I would like the compression ratio to end up between 18:1 to 19:1 but if 20:1 was doable, that would be perfect. This should help low end torque tremendously and should be better for fuel economy and provide a slight reduction in EGT's while towing, correct?
A set of 18.5:1 12V pistons and some light block surfacing should get me to an easy 19:1, provided they have the top ring insert to handle added compression pressures from turbocharging (which I think they do).
On the other hand, some block work and a set of 24V pistons can get to 18:1.
Which setup will be better for low end and fuel economy? The higher compression 12V or the slightly lower compression 24V? I know the 18:1 24V will be easier to make HP numbers, but that isn't my main concern...
Then for the camshaft - I have installed a few Colt stage 2 and 3 cams and have been happy with them. Stick with Colt or move to the Hamilton camp? Which cam from either suppler?
Then for the pump selection - I am leaning towards the old VE since it takes up less room, knocks out good mileage numbers (not that the P Pump doesn't), may make better low end torque, and will be easier on the wallet. That, and it should make 400 HP with ease.
Turbo will probably be an S362SXE.
Thoughts on what I am trying to put together? Remember, max power is not the end goal - fuel economy and drive-ability is...
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 05:36 PM
|
#2
|
Name: Highwayman
Title: bored.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wacko
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,087
|
If I were going for fuel economy in a solid daily driver, I’d look at the VE stuff well before a p7100. every mild VE pumped truck I’ve been around has been way nicer than the in-line.
I’m not well versed in the compression so I won’t comment on that.
__________________
97 Dodge 2500 RCLB ( scrapped)
1973 F250 crew (soon to receive new power train)
COMPD:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcfreak24
Lolzzzzzz fakin haters
|
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 05:45 PM
|
#3
|
Name: Signature600
Title: THA MAN!
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 11,975
|
VE will make a lot of torque, get better fuel economy, and be more different sub-400hp.
Chris
__________________
THANKS TO:
Tim Barber @ TRE Diesel
Jeff Mumau @ Mumau Diesel Service
Rip @ Source Automotive
Don Thuren @ ThurenFab Suspension
Columbus Diesel Supply
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 06:26 PM
|
#4
|
Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
|
I'd just buy a good running ve engine complete take out and o-ring the head with valve springs and call it done for the power your looking for. Save a pile of money and get the same results.
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 06:27 PM
|
#5
|
Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
|
Just bolt on's from there.
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 08:49 PM
|
#6
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonc
I'd just buy a good running ve engine complete take out and o-ring the head with valve springs and call it done for the power your looking for. Save a pile of money and get the same results.
|
I don't think you need O-rings to make 400 HP - studs will hold no problem, won't they? I'm thinking 40 PSI out of the S362 will be enough for 375 - 400...
I would like to utilize the parts I have to build a max efficiency engine - not sure how spending ~ $2000 on a VE pumped engine that will still need a complete gasket set, machine work to deck the head, possible pump rebuild, and a camshaft will save a pile of money - basically the only thing I would be paying $2000 for over what I have would be the core pump and the pistons - pistons that I don't necessarily even want...
So back to the original questions - any other input?
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
|
|
|
04-05-2018, 10:01 PM
|
#7
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
I would think a 362sxe is more expensive than a K27 which is a stock drop in, and has a max Rwhp rating of 450 at a price tag of 1000.00
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 06:25 AM
|
#8
|
Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
I don't think you need O-rings to make 400 HP - studs will hold no problem, won't they? I'm thinking 40 PSI out of the S362 will be enough for 375 - 400...
I would like to utilize the parts I have to build a max efficiency engine - not sure how spending ~ $2000 on a VE pumped engine that will still need a complete gasket set, machine work to deck the head, possible pump rebuild, and a camshaft will save a pile of money - basically the only thing I would be paying $2000 for over what I have would be the core pump and the pistons - pistons that I don't necessarily even want...
So back to the original questions - any other input?
|
No o rings are necessary but the cost to o ring the head and basic upgrade valve springs is around $600 in my area, stock headbolts work just fine. Throw a pan gasket and crank seals. A stock ve motor with even 200k on it, the cylinders will still have perfect cross hatch. Do the basic ve pump upgrades, I hate saying mods, and a small turbo and your there.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 06:33 AM
|
#9
|
Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
|
And a set of $450 injectors.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 07:49 AM
|
#10
|
Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
|
Imo you will want orings and studs for the amount of compression you plan on running. Cylinder pressures are going to be through the roof with a rotary pump and small turbo.
Out of both of my trucks I much prefer the 24v head. Less smoke and better response. This is comparing both trucks with inline pumps.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 08:29 AM
|
#11
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justappumped24v
I would think a 362sxe is more expensive than a K27 which is a stock drop in, and has a max Rwhp rating of 450 at a price tag of 1000.00
|
Hmm, a K27 is a stock drop in in a 2006 F350 with a Cummins? How can anything related to a conversion be a "stock drop in"?
While a K27 is less money than an S362SXE, it is a lot more money than an HE351CW and I don't think the K27 is worth the $800 more than the HE351. In my mind, with a VE, if you need more than an HE351, the next step is an S362.
The reason I think the S362 would be better is that it would run lower boost at cruising speeds, which should have a positive effect on fuel mileage.
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
Last edited by 1972RedNeck; 04-06-2018 at 08:40 AM.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 08:33 AM
|
#12
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlbayes
Imo you will want orings and studs for the amount of compression you plan on running. Cylinder pressures are going to be through the roof with a rotary pump and small turbo.
Out of both of my trucks I much prefer the 24v head. Less smoke and better response. This is comparing both trucks with inline pumps.
|
Less smoke and better response sounds like a win win to me. Both of your trucks are setup similar outside of the heads?
If I end up going with the 24V setup, compression will only be in the 18:1 range - only .5 higher than stock. I'm thinking studs will get the job done.
If I run a 12V setup I will be in the 19:1 range and then you're probably right that o-rings would be advantageous in the long run.
So which is better for low end power and mileage, all else being equal?
24V with 18:1 compression ratio?
Or 12V with 19:1 compression ratio?
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 08:43 AM
|
#13
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonc
No o rings are necessary but the cost to o ring the head and basic upgrade valve springs is around $600 in my area, stock headbolts work just fine. Throw a pan gasket and crank seals. A stock ve motor with even 200k on it, the cylinders will still have perfect cross hatch. Do the basic ve pump upgrades, I hate saying mods, and a small turbo and your there.
|
I'm not just looking for a 400 HP number - if I was, I would just build a mild 454 Big Block Chevy and be done with it.
400HP is the least of my worries. I want peak efficiency...
So no, a stock engine with basic upgrades will not get me "there".
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
Last edited by 1972RedNeck; 04-06-2018 at 08:44 AM.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 08:59 AM
|
#14
|
Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
Less smoke and better response sounds like a win win to me. Both of your trucks are setup similar outside of the heads?
If I end up going with the 24V setup, compression will only be in the 18:1 range - only .5 higher than stock. I'm thinking studs will get the job done.
If I run a 12V setup I will be in the 19:1 range and then you're probably right that o-rings would be advantageous in the long run.
So which is better for low end power and mileage, all else being equal?
24V with 18:1 compression ratio?
Or 12V with 19:1 compression ratio?
|
No, wildly different injector and turbo setups. The 24v still drove cleaner with micro blind sac wide cone angle injectors with 26* of timing than the 12v with factory 215 injectors and less timing. Both had 180 pumps.
Imo you will not notice the difference in the point of compression between the two. How agressive you are with the timing would be the key between them.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 08:59 AM
|
#15
|
Name: sootie
Title: .....like a BAWSS
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2013
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 866
|
If you know so much, stop asking questions. You argue with almost everything suggested...
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 09:02 AM
|
#16
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sootie
If you know so much, stop asking questions. You argue with almost everything suggested...
|
Almost everything - the question I am looking for answers for is this:
Which is better for low end power and mileage, all else being equal?
24V with 18:1 compression ratio?
Or 12V with 19:1 compression ratio?
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 09:05 AM
|
#17
|
Name: 1972RedNeck
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Townsend, MT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlbayes
No, wildly different injector and turbo setups. The 24v still drove cleaner with micro blind sac wide cone angle injectors with 26* of timing than the 12v with factory 215 injectors and less timing. Both had 180 pumps.
Imo you will not notice the difference in the point of compression between the two. How agressive you are with the timing would be the key between them.
|
Is a 24V or 12V more tolerant of higher timing numbers?
__________________
1990 F350 4X4, Sterling 10.25, Dana 60, E4OD
4BTA, HX30W/H1C Compounds, 5X16 Injectors
Quote:
Originally Posted by longhorn859
Assemble, floor it.
|
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 11:10 AM
|
#18
|
Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
I'm not just looking for a 400 HP number - if I was, I would just build a mild 454 Big Block Chevy and be done with it.
400HP is the least of my worries. I want peak efficiency...
So no, a stock engine with basic upgrades will not get me "there".
|
Well sorry for the confusion, just going off what you said you were looking for in your first post for 400hp.
I'd do a deckplate 6.4 with a 13mm pump and a 88mm single charger then, ha.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 12:05 PM
|
#19
|
Name: Signature600
Title: THA MAN!
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 11,975
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
......
My goal is to achieve maximum fuel economy, street-ability, tow-ability, and low end torque with a byproduct of 400 or so HP.
......
Thoughts on what I am trying to put together? Remember, max power is not the end goal - fuel economy and drive-ability is...
|
Excuse us for reading....
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
Is a 24V or 12V more tolerant of higher timing numbers?
|
What does the number of valves have to do with timing?
Chris
__________________
THANKS TO:
Tim Barber @ TRE Diesel
Jeff Mumau @ Mumau Diesel Service
Rip @ Source Automotive
Don Thuren @ ThurenFab Suspension
Columbus Diesel Supply
Last edited by Signature600; 04-06-2018 at 12:07 PM.
|
|
|
04-06-2018, 12:08 PM
|
#20
|
Name: Red Sleeper
Title: Too Much Time
Status:
Here
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lone Star State
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,596
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sootie
If you know so much, stop asking questions. You argue with almost everything suggested...
|
Exactly. The definition of insanity comes to mind.
If you want peak efficiency, then inject CNG into a stock engine.
__________________
Nick J
'14 Silverado LTZ 5.3 4wd
'05 Cummins QCSB 4wd 48re
'91 Cummins w350 5spd
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.
|