Advertisement
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Home Who's Online Today's Posts HP Calculator CompD Gift Shop Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together > Tech Area- Dodge > Dodge Competition and Performance
Register Members List Timeslips EFI Live Library Invite Your Friends FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Dodge Competition and Performance General Dodge Competition and Performance Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2007, 09:34 PM   #41
lotero
 
lotero's Avatar

Name: lotero
Title: I BREAK STUFF
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 218
i love my SPS62/14, i dynoed 534 with the drag comp and am now making more power (SOP) with the quad box. it does get toasty but i can control that easily, well worth it in streetability in my opinion.
__________________
<-- THAT TRUCK FOR SALE!

FS 2000 QCSB 4x4 Diesel Power Magazine featured Dodge CTD - Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together

A NATION THAT FORGETS ITS DEFENDERS WILL ITSELF BE FORGOTTEN.
 
Old 11-28-2007, 06:10 PM   #42
silverbullet

Name: silverbullet
Title: Master of Disaster
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Butt ****ing Egypt
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 89
A good part of the time, small businesses will do better work than a large corporation, but not always. Until you got tolerances from each place and mic'd these turbo's, it would be hard to say. As a tool, die and injection molder maker, I'm familiar with just about all machines. Like duke said, " this isn't rocket science". What special equipment do they have that these other guys don't?
__________________
07 6.7 handshaker

Last edited by Smokem; 11-29-2007 at 12:13 AM.
 
Old 11-28-2007, 06:16 PM   #43
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
I will say this from my high volume machining experience. Some machines are just not capable of maintaining tolerances. If II and HTT are just slapping them on a old CNC, hand gaging parts then it could be, or if BW has inline gages, CNC's with scales on them, or machines are programmed to compensate for backlash in the screws then this could be the case. I came from a huge machining plant, and have seen machines all across the board. Show me what II, HTT, and BW have as well as their gaging/quality system, I could make a determination.
 
Old 11-28-2007, 06:45 PM   #44
silverbullet

Name: silverbullet
Title: Master of Disaster
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Butt ****ing Egypt
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by zstroken
I will say this from my high volume machining experience. Some machines are just not capable of maintaining tolerances. If II and HTT are just slapping them on a old CNC, hand gaging parts then it could be, or if BW has inline gages, CNC's with scales on them, or machines are programmed to compensate for backlash in the screws then this could be the case. I came from a huge machining plant, and have seen machines all across the board. Show me what II, HTT, and BW have as well as their gaging/quality system, I could make a determination.
Good points! Lot's of variables to consider. No offense smokem, but I don't believe you have got dimensions & tolerances from any of these guys, disassembled, and mic'd them. When you say quality of machine work... do you mean the finish, if so I can give you a glass like finish all day long, but that doesn't mean I'm within tolerance.
__________________
07 6.7 handshaker

Last edited by silverbullet; 11-28-2007 at 06:57 PM.
 
Old 11-28-2007, 10:55 PM   #45
duke1n
 
duke1n's Avatar

Name: duke1n
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,834
Ok cool do believe that either one of those examples require maching tolerances that cannot be produced by machines owned by HTT or II or is that just an example of poor execution?

Last edited by Smokem; 11-29-2007 at 12:25 AM.
 
Old 11-28-2007, 11:12 PM   #46
duke1n
 
duke1n's Avatar

Name: duke1n
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,834
LMAO I can write two algorithms that look entirely different. One can be eloquent and neat and the other can appear repetitive and sloppy. Both of them will produce Big O of log base2 N and perform identically. Beauty is more than skin deep
 
Old 11-29-2007, 09:17 AM   #47
coon smile
 
coon smile's Avatar

Name: coon smile
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern WV
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,399
hey how bout we keep algorithms and anything calculus related out of this discussion.

why would someone sit here and make up lies about machining tolerances on different turbos? unless u personally know smokem and what he does for a living or in his spare time, then just be willing to accept his opinion - everyone has em (you know the saying) - just like you are entitled to you own.
__________________
'06 Megacab 4x4
 
Old 11-29-2007, 10:18 AM   #48
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
I am not disputing who makes a better turbo. Things need to be taken into consideration. GM was famous for holding tolerances much tighter than toyota. The issue why toyota could make a better package was that their process had the ability to address the issues of the looser tolerance. Maybe the tolerances that BW use aren't needed. I mean I have ran the tar out of a prostreet 66 and a silver bullet and not had a failure yet. Unless the total process is known you can't really determine quality off of a few samples from each. Here is an example. One shop uses a manual CNC and gages every part that comes off by hand with a go/no go gage. This will probably insure that every part that goes out is within spec. Shop number two pulls 1 part out of 20 off of the line and runns it on a cms machine. Takes the readings and makes adjustments. What happened to the other 19? Do we assume that since 1 and 20 were in spec that 2-19 are also? I would prefer the 100% go no/go. Now if they are 100% inline gaging, then that would be different. Unless someone has several cases of where a super B special outperforms or has more durability over a SPS64 or a HTT QD64 we are just speculating that the specs really matter. I mean it is like looking at a polished compressor housing. It sure looks nice, but does it help the performance of the charger.
 
Old 11-29-2007, 12:19 PM   #49
coon smile
 
coon smile's Avatar

Name: coon smile
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern WV
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,399
the main concern i have is durability...is dave @ bd diesel saying the max boost for the special is 45psi to keep people from pushing the limits of the charger and the warranty?

or is the turbo designed for 45psi? b/c some other people are saying it can take a lot more than that
__________________
'06 Megacab 4x4
 
Old 11-29-2007, 01:42 PM   #50
BDPowerDave
 
BDPowerDave's Avatar

Name: BDPowerDave
Title: BD-Power Rep.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by coon smile
the main concern i have is durability...is dave @ bd diesel saying the max boost for the special is 45psi to keep people from pushing the limits of the charger and the warranty?

or is the turbo designed for 45psi? b/c some other people are saying it can take a lot more than that
Yes I am saying that 45PSI is max on the Special, that is its peak efficiency range and should have no need to go past that or its not the right charger for the customer! The only failures on the Specials that I have seen have all been related to over boost, where the wastegates were modified or pinched off. Doing this makes it impossible to know what kind of drive pressures and boost they were making when they failed. You would think guys would at least re-adjust the wastgate back to 45 PSI before sending them back for warranty???

What I am finding is that guys are either using the Special with the wastegate pinched off because they can't afford twins or because they do not want to move into a twin turbo class for sled pulling, that is not what the Special is designed for. It was intended for the diesel guy who wants a reliable performance turbo, does not tow a RV trailer and uses the truck for mild competition weekend fun. As much as I would like to come on here and rave about how great the Special works for Sled puilling with 600HP, it is not that turbo.
__________________

Last edited by BDPowerDave; 11-29-2007 at 01:52 PM.
 
Old 11-29-2007, 04:16 PM   #51
coon smile
 
coon smile's Avatar

Name: coon smile
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastern WV
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDPowerDave
Yes I am saying that 45PSI is max on the Special, that is its peak efficiency range and should have no need to go past that or its not the right charger for the customer! The only failures on the Specials that I have seen have all been related to over boost, where the wastegates were modified or pinched off. Doing this makes it impossible to know what kind of drive pressures and boost they were making when they failed. You would think guys would at least re-adjust the wastgate back to 45 PSI before sending them back for warranty???

What I am finding is that guys are either using the Special with the wastegate pinched off because they can't afford twins or because they do not want to move into a twin turbo class for sled pulling, that is not what the Special is designed for. It was intended for the diesel guy who wants a reliable performance turbo, does not tow a RV trailer and uses the truck for mild competition weekend fun. As much as I would like to come on here and rave about how great the Special works for Sled puilling with 600HP, it is not that turbo.
thanks for clearing that up dave...
__________________
'06 Megacab 4x4
 
Old 11-29-2007, 05:48 PM   #52
Schoust
 
Schoust's Avatar

Name: Schoust
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2007
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 742
Hey Dave is it your opinion still that the special is really not the turbo for an every day driver 12 valve engined truck? I talked with you a while back about this and I was wondering if you still felt this way? I really wanted to go that route but I wasn't sure you helped me decide that one. Starting to think I might have been Ok.....
__________________
07 QC Big Horn 5.9 auto Completely stock so far...
 
Old 11-29-2007, 06:05 PM   #53
BDPowerDave
 
BDPowerDave's Avatar

Name: BDPowerDave
Title: BD-Power Rep.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schoust
Hey Dave is it your opinion still that the special is really not the turbo for an every day driver 12 valve engined truck? I talked with you a while back about this and I was wondering if you still felt this way? I really wanted to go that route but I wasn't sure you helped me decide that one. Starting to think I might have been Ok.....
Yes that is still my opinion, only you would know if you could live with it, tough call!

If you are running past 450HP and do not mind loosing a little spool up time in exchange for a whole lot of top end then the special is okay. Its those times in slower traffic that you loose that driveability, the turbo does not get a chance to light up. I have customers out there that really don't care about that or spend so much time on the open road that it does not matter and are happy with the Special. Here in Vancouver with the congestion I like the snappy response of the Super B Single until I can offord twins.
__________________

Last edited by BDPowerDave; 11-29-2007 at 06:11 PM.
 
Old 11-29-2007, 06:19 PM   #54
chrleb1
 
chrleb1's Avatar

Name: chrleb1
Title: Charlie Brown
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Dale, Ca
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 620
Mine is puching high boost because of fuel. I think the wastegate is set at 42. Mine isn't altered or pinched.
__________________
Erick Brown

2003 Dodge, Smarty, plus stuff. Makes big power.

Goerend's trans parts, Built by Reb, holding 1,138 rwhp.....

98 12 valve 2wd quad cab short bed .... it's slow
 
Old 11-29-2007, 06:34 PM   #55
BDPowerDave
 
BDPowerDave's Avatar

Name: BDPowerDave
Title: BD-Power Rep.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrleb1
Mine is puching high boost because of fuel. I think the wastegate is set at 42. Mine isn't altered or pinched.
What do you mean by punching high boost, the boost is spiking to 42 PSI soon as you get you foot into it?
__________________
 
Old 11-29-2007, 07:02 PM   #56
SuperDave4x4
 
SuperDave4x4's Avatar

Name: SuperDave4x4
Title: popcorn playa
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Luling, Louisiana
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,416
Well I like my Super B special. I can hit 950* with just everyday driving down back roads with hills to and from work/school, but this is luggin the motor and my tc is locked at about 45-52 or so mph. The highest I've hit was around 1150* going up a nice long hill while doing 54-60mph. I knew this charger was going to be laggy, but I expected it to be worse to tell you the truth. To me it's fine for everday driving. I mean hell I don't floor it from light to light or stop sign to stop sign. It's a pretty larger charger! If I do get on it in town I roll into it and then get on it and it does just fine. I'm still getting used to it and I like it more and more everyday I drive it.


Oh and the top end on this sucker is WOW!
__________________
2020 Ram 2500 CCLB 4x4

(Sold)1999 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 24v CTD Ext. Cab- 01' motor w/ orings, .020 gasket, Garmon/SunCoast, Drag comp, 150hp EDMs, 57/72 twins, AD150, 20" Hoss, Proxes STII, Thuren/Carli, etc

Member #41

 
Old 11-30-2007, 10:27 AM   #57
BDPowerDave
 
BDPowerDave's Avatar

Name: BDPowerDave
Title: BD-Power Rep.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave4x4
Well I like my Super B special. I can hit 950* with just everyday driving down back roads with hills to and from work/school, but this is luggin the motor and my tc is locked at about 45-52 or so mph. The highest I've hit was around 1150* going up a nice long hill while doing 54-60mph. I knew this charger was going to be laggy, but I expected it to be worse to tell you the truth. To me it's fine for everday driving. I mean hell I don't floor it from light to light or stop sign to stop sign. It's a pretty larger charger! If I do get on it in town I roll into it and then get on it and it does just fine. I'm still getting used to it and I like it more and more everyday I drive it.


Oh and the top end on this sucker is WOW!

Thanks for the excellent report, that really describes the Super B Special well, your driving style is well suited to the Special.
__________________

Last edited by BDPowerDave; 11-30-2007 at 10:30 AM.
 
Old 11-30-2007, 11:04 AM   #58
chrleb1
 
chrleb1's Avatar

Name: chrleb1
Title: Charlie Brown
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Dale, Ca
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 620
I meant to spell pushing.... sometimes i don't read my writing. Anyways, if i have my fueling turned down, the wastegate is able to keep the boost at 42 or so. If i turn up the fueling, the wastegate doesn't do a good enough job and the boost keeps climbing. That is why i can hit 60 psi with this turbo and that is not touching the wastegate straight from the box.
__________________
Erick Brown

2003 Dodge, Smarty, plus stuff. Makes big power.

Goerend's trans parts, Built by Reb, holding 1,138 rwhp.....

98 12 valve 2wd quad cab short bed .... it's slow
 
Old 11-30-2007, 11:23 AM   #59
BDPowerDave
 
BDPowerDave's Avatar

Name: BDPowerDave
Title: BD-Power Rep.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: B.C. Canada
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 317
I though so, I do it all the time!

870 HP holy poop! no wonder the wastegate is not helping!

I would love to see a set of R700 BD twins on that truck. Lets find a home for the Special and work you a deal on the R700's
__________________
 
Old 11-30-2007, 01:33 PM   #60
chrleb1
 
chrleb1's Avatar

Name: chrleb1
Title: Charlie Brown
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Dale, Ca
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 620
Actually i am building a compound setup right now. It'll be a Pius USB over an S510 and dual intercooled and dual wastegated. I plan on pushing 2,100 cfm worth of air. No offence what-so-ever, I don't think the R700 twin setup will support 4,000 rpm and 75 psi and push 2,100 without super-heating the air. I want over 1,000 hp. I think the R700 will only push .8 to .85 kg/s . I need roughly 1.04 - 1.14 kg/s with 4,000 rpms.

I know the R700 is an awesome setup for pushing 700-800 hp. I'm just concerned on what it would do with RPMs. I'll be running 50 mm and 38 mm wastegates to control the exhaust and boost pressures.
__________________
Erick Brown

2003 Dodge, Smarty, plus stuff. Makes big power.

Goerend's trans parts, Built by Reb, holding 1,138 rwhp.....

98 12 valve 2wd quad cab short bed .... it's slow
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.

 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024, CompetitionDiesel.com
all information found on this site is property of www.competitiondiesel.com