Advertisement
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Home Who's Online Today's Posts HP Calculator CompD Gift Shop Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together > Tech Area- Dodge > Dodge Competition and Performance
Register Members List Timeslips EFI Live Library Invite Your Friends FAQ Calendar

Dodge Competition and Performance General Dodge Competition and Performance Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2016, 07:37 PM   #1
ehines218
 
ehines218's Avatar

Name: ehines218
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Touchet
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 365
Triples

So I'm looking into the idea of running a triple setup. I know this isn't the most cost effective or easiest but that's not what I'm going for. Right now I have the sxe 69 I'd like to run it as the manifold charger but what should I run for my 2 atmospheric chargers.
__________________
Weston 6x.013, Borg Warner S369xe, Homemade intake with AFE filter and AFE intake horn, tunnel ram, 5 in stright pipe to 6 in homemade diamond stack, built auto, Quad adrenaline 1000/4k and soon
 
Old 08-08-2016, 10:47 AM   #2
ehines218
 
ehines218's Avatar

Name: ehines218
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Touchet
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 365
That's what I was thinking as well but when I was doing research I was seeing people using 2 bigger chargers going into a smaller charger which didn't make sense to me cause the 2 chargers are supposed to act to get her to work as the bigger charger correct?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
__________________
Weston 6x.013, Borg Warner S369xe, Homemade intake with AFE filter and AFE intake horn, tunnel ram, 5 in stright pipe to 6 in homemade diamond stack, built auto, Quad adrenaline 1000/4k and soon
 
Old 08-08-2016, 03:59 PM   #3
12vCumminsFTW
 
12vCumminsFTW's Avatar

Name: 12vCumminsFTW
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Willcox, AZ
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,377
I have 2 sxe66's for sale from my triple setup, they were wicked. Those and your 69 would be good for well over 1000 hp. Looks like you still have VP tho? might be too much unless you planning on going p-pump
__________________
-Aaron H.

97 12v 4x4
 
Old 08-08-2016, 05:42 PM   #4
ehines218
 
ehines218's Avatar

Name: ehines218
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Touchet
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 365
I'm eventually going common rail but that is a couple years down the road still

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
__________________
Weston 6x.013, Borg Warner S369xe, Homemade intake with AFE filter and AFE intake horn, tunnel ram, 5 in stright pipe to 6 in homemade diamond stack, built auto, Quad adrenaline 1000/4k and soon
 
Old 08-09-2016, 06:48 AM   #5
BlackasCoal
 
BlackasCoal's Avatar

Name: BlackasCoal
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Camp Lejeune NC but grown in PA
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 628
What are those 2 - 66's comparable to, flow wise?
__________________
07.5 MCSB, Thuren/Carli/King, 35" Toyos MT's, 17" Methods, Miller’s Machine Shop 6.4 w/ Wagler long rods, QSB pistons, 188/220 cam, Ported/big valve head, Muldoons Phat shaft 48re w/ anteater, DDP 5.9 fuel, Firepunk 66/85, Firepunk EFI
 
Old 08-09-2016, 08:29 AM   #6
jlbayes
 
jlbayes's Avatar

Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackasCoal View Post
What are those 2 - 66's comparable to, flow wise?
Just shy of 190lbs per min on the compressor side, combined.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
 
Old 08-09-2016, 08:39 AM   #7
BlackasCoal
 
BlackasCoal's Avatar

Name: BlackasCoal
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Camp Lejeune NC but grown in PA
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 628
So a good 20lbs ish more than a s595? With better response?
__________________
07.5 MCSB, Thuren/Carli/King, 35" Toyos MT's, 17" Methods, Miller’s Machine Shop 6.4 w/ Wagler long rods, QSB pistons, 188/220 cam, Ported/big valve head, Muldoons Phat shaft 48re w/ anteater, DDP 5.9 fuel, Firepunk 66/85, Firepunk EFI
 
Old 08-09-2016, 08:58 AM   #8
LAmiller
 
LAmiller's Avatar

Name: LAmiller
Title: THE KT-BOUNDARY
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Plain City, OH
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,603
We've had a 05 CR with dual stock pumps, 300% over Exergy injectors and a 364 on the manifold and a pair of 366 as the primaries do 1297HP @110psi. Getting the manifold turbine wheel/housing to flow your peak HP goal is important.

Lavon
__________________
04.5 QDLB 4x4 Diesel Power Challenge 2014/2015 Champion, ODSS 6.70 Points Champion 2015/2016
06 RaceCab 4x4 Ulimate Callout Challenge 2016, 2017, 2018 Champion, ODSS Pro Street Points Champion 2016
2016 QDLB 4x4, Firepunk EZLynk.
http://www.shop.firepunk.com
 
Old 08-09-2016, 06:23 PM   #9
12vCumminsFTW
 
12vCumminsFTW's Avatar

Name: 12vCumminsFTW
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Willcox, AZ
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAmiller View Post
We've had a 05 CR with dual stock pumps, 300% over Exergy injectors and a 364 on the manifold and a pair of 366 as the primaries do 1297HP @110psi. Getting the manifold turbine wheel/housing to flow your peak HP goal is important.

Lavon
This. I was running a t3 63/68 with those chargers, not near enough turbine Didn't compound worth a crap.
__________________
-Aaron H.

97 12v 4x4
 
Old 08-09-2016, 06:56 PM   #10
jasonc

Name: jasonc
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2009
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAmiller View Post
We've had a 05 CR with dual stock pumps, 300% over Exergy injectors and a 364 on the manifold and a pair of 366 as the primaries do 1297HP @110psi. Getting the manifold turbine wheel/housing to flow your peak HP goal is important.

Lavon
I'd assume your saying then the t4 .91 with the 74 turbine, or running an exhaust housing larger?
 
Old 08-09-2016, 09:29 PM   #11
ehines218
 
ehines218's Avatar

Name: ehines218
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Touchet
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 365
So what I'm thinking right now is running the 69 with the t4 .91 housing on the manifold with 2 sxe 62's feeding it. I don't know what exhaust housings to go with though

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
__________________
Weston 6x.013, Borg Warner S369xe, Homemade intake with AFE filter and AFE intake horn, tunnel ram, 5 in stright pipe to 6 in homemade diamond stack, built auto, Quad adrenaline 1000/4k and soon
 
Old 08-10-2016, 08:53 AM   #12
ehines218
 
ehines218's Avatar

Name: ehines218
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Touchet
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 365
The 69 is supposed to flow 95 lbs per minute, and the 62's are supposed to flow 76 lbs per minute so 152 total lbs out of the 2

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
__________________
Weston 6x.013, Borg Warner S369xe, Homemade intake with AFE filter and AFE intake horn, tunnel ram, 5 in stright pipe to 6 in homemade diamond stack, built auto, Quad adrenaline 1000/4k and soon
 
Old 10-29-2016, 06:04 PM   #13
kleann
 
kleann's Avatar

Name: kleann
Title: VP44 pwr
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Down yonder
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,388
I was thinking for a cheap setup - 2 s369sxe with 0.90 housings and a s475/98.132 on the manifold. Anyone have any thoughts on that?
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.

 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024, CompetitionDiesel.com
all information found on this site is property of www.competitiondiesel.com