Advertisement
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Home Who's Online Today's Posts HP Calculator CompD Gift Shop Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together > Tech Area- Dodge > Dodge Competition and Performance
Register Members List Timeslips EFI Live Library Invite Your Friends FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Dodge Competition and Performance General Dodge Competition and Performance Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2016, 10:24 PM   #1
79fordcrew

Name: 79fordcrew
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2014
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 130
What about this compound setup

Would a 362sxe over a 369sxe be a good compound setup or are they two close in size. I would think it would spool crazy fast. Also if it would work what kind of power would it support.
 
Old 12-01-2016, 10:42 PM   #2
67baja

Name: 67baja
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2015
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 34
Look at power driven diesels video of their towing compounds using the s369 as the primary. Iirc, they did 690 hp.
 
Old 12-01-2016, 10:51 PM   #3
79fordcrew

Name: 79fordcrew
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2014
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 130
Would it flow enough to support 800 to say a 1000hp. Definitely not saying that's my goal. But also don't want to buy turbos two or three times. Truck is driven daily and I like drag racing so I like the idea of fast spoolup. Just wondering if it would flow the air to support those numbers.
 
Old 12-02-2016, 06:31 AM   #4
badbowtie
 
badbowtie's Avatar

Name: badbowtie
Title: custom engine daydreamer
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Plainfield IN
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 475
No way, they even say that their test truck is tuned very aggressively. I don't believe your going to get much more than just dyno variations out of that setup. The s300 turbine I think is maxed out. You need a big turbo to move 1000hp worth of air.

96 3500 5x018 7mm dvs 62fmw
__________________
1996 3500 4x4 5spd
1991 D350 5spd
 
Old 12-02-2016, 07:59 AM   #5
jlbayes
 
jlbayes's Avatar

Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67baja View Post
Look at power driven diesels video of their towing compounds using the s369 as the primary. Iirc, they did 690 hp.
With a 25% correction factor......

Quote:
Originally Posted by 79fordcrew View Post
Would it flow enough to support 800 to say a 1000hp. Definitely not saying that's my goal. But also don't want to buy turbos two or three times. Truck is driven daily and I like drag racing so I like the idea of fast spoolup. Just wondering if it would flow the air to support those numbers.
Absolutely not.....
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
 
Old 12-02-2016, 09:26 AM   #6
79fordcrew

Name: 79fordcrew
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2014
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 130
OK what would be a good cheaper setup for a 1000hp worth of air. Still reasonably quick spooling s362 sxe over a gt4202? 472sxe or do I. Need to go bigger on small turbo
 
Old 12-02-2016, 09:33 AM   #7
79fordcrew

Name: 79fordcrew
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2014
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 130
And wouldn't the k27 limit airflow on power drivens compound setup? Just thinking out loud here.
 
Old 12-02-2016, 10:23 AM   #8
jlbayes
 
jlbayes's Avatar

Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
An s480 or comparable primary. A smaller s362/68 will work but it is going to require an external gate.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
 
Old 12-03-2016, 03:04 AM   #9
Big Blue24
 
Big Blue24's Avatar

Name: Big Blue24
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedar City, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlbayes View Post
With a 25% correction factor......



Absolutely not.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlbayes View Post
An s480 or comparable primary. A smaller s362/68 will work but it is going to require an external gate.
Why would you assert that our 690 HP dyno pull had a 25% correction factor and therefore absolutely will not support 800 to 1000 HP, then later post that an S480 or comparable primary will support the 1000 HP power goal?

By your math, our 690 HP after a 25% reduction = 552 raw HP from the "poor flowing" 369sxe that roughly flows 100 lbs per minute.

So using your math, the S480 which roughly flows 120 lbs per minute or 20% more should support a whopping 662 HP or nowhere near the original poster's power goal.

Free internet-based education is just that, free. Real education comes from hours of testing, studying reliable materials, and reflection/pondering the data, creating theories, then more testing. I will admit that I enjoy reading internet based data and power numbers from other shops, other dynos, and other trucks. It is fun to bench race dynos, compare numbers, compare time slips, etc. At the end of the day, testing turbos on the same truck with the same dyno is the best way to see trends and gather data to form theories and project power numbers.

This is internet advice, so take it for what it's worth, we generally see 7hp raw "uncorrected" at the tire per LB of air moved by the turbo on a mechanical injection 12v cummins and 8hp raw "uncorrected" per LB of air moved by the turbo on a well-tuned common rail. These are attainable realistic numbers that most trucks can achieve.

For 1000 HP on a 12v Cummins, we'd recommend a turbo system capable of 142 lbs per minute

For 1000 HP on a Common Rail, we'd recommend a turbo system capable of 125 lbs per minute which is still a little larger than an S480. Not that a few perfectly tuned common rails haven't hit 1k HP with an S480 spun off the map, just that you really need 125 lbs per minute to do it reliably on most trucks.
__________________
95' 2wd Junker Drag Truck
1502 HP Fuel-Only 12mm P7100 Pump
SXE 472 over GTX55 116mm
OEM 12v Block
 
Old 12-03-2016, 03:27 AM   #10
Big Blue24
 
Big Blue24's Avatar

Name: Big Blue24
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedar City, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79fordcrew View Post
And wouldn't the k27 limit airflow on power drivens compound setup? Just thinking out loud here.
There are some pumping/efficiency losses forcing 700 HP worth of exhaust through a turbine wheel/housing designed for 300 HP. This is why we give our K27/369 towing compound setup a 650 HP power rating.

Very soon, we will have our new "Power Tow" setup on the dyno which is a K27/472sxe compound turbo system. After dyno testing, we will see if the K27 is a limiting factor or if the bigger S472 will deliver 10% higher numbers in line with its larger 110 lb per minute flow map.

We recently dyno tested a 369sxe single vs. 366sxe single same-day, same-fueling, same-turbine housing on my Junker Drag Truck, and we ended up with a 6% peak power difference, not the flow map predicted 14% difference. Next round of testing will be with a larger exhaust housing setup and T4 manifold to test the theory that turbine flow is somewhat limiting the 369sxe and not allowing it to make the full 14% increase over the 366sxe.

And for those wondering, the 369SX-E stuffed in a .80AR T3 wastegated housing on the stock manifold made a little over 50 psi boost and well over 700 HP to the rear tires. These were much better power numbers than what we saw on our other test mule 12v.
__________________
95' 2wd Junker Drag Truck
1502 HP Fuel-Only 12mm P7100 Pump
SXE 472 over GTX55 116mm
OEM 12v Block
 
Old 12-03-2016, 03:30 AM   #11
Tate
 
Tate's Avatar

Name: Tate
Title: What?
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,419
Do you measure air mass flow on the dyno?
__________________
'98 3500 2wd, 24v, 5 spd, p-pumped
'98 2500 4wd, 12v, 6 spd, VP'd
'02 VW Jetta, 5 spd.

My p-pump conversion pics
 
Old 12-03-2016, 07:13 AM   #12
Drothgeb
 
Drothgeb's Avatar

Name: Drothgeb
Title: Almost Fast-N-Loud
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maryland
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 820
I completely agree with your 7hp/lb generally speaking for a 12v. I made 824hp flowing ~120lbs and 964hp flowing ~140lbs (both uncorrected). But, I couldn't check the actual mass flow. Everything was calculated based on rpm/pressure/air temp with a guesstimated VE of 90%.

But I'd also like to point out, that there are 80mm wheels for a s480 that flow a lot more than 120lbs. So while it's not likely you'll hit 1000hp with a stock s480, it's not impossible to hit it with a 80mm turbo. Good luck though.
__________________
95 RCLB 4WD
10.66 sec, 128.93mph
I'm not a Cummins expert, but I did sleep at Holiday Inn Express
 
Old 12-03-2016, 09:36 AM   #13
r-rated diesel
 
r-rated diesel's Avatar

Name: r-rated diesel
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2011
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drothgeb View Post
I completely agree with your 7hp/lb generally speaking for a 12v. I made 824hp flowing ~120lbs and 964hp flowing ~140lbs (both uncorrected). But, I couldn't check the actual mass flow. Everything was calculated based on rpm/pressure/air temp with a guesstimated VE of 90%.

But I'd also like to point out, that there are 80mm wheels for a s480 that flow a lot more than 120lbs. So while it's not likely you'll hit 1000hp with a stock s480, it's not impossible to hit it with a 80mm turbo. Good luck though.
I agree^^ my old cr with a billet s480 as a primary made 1009hp uncorrerted
 
Old 12-03-2016, 12:09 PM   #14
Smokem
 
Smokem's Avatar

Name: Smokem
Title: Turbler
Status: Not Here
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 5,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Blue24 View Post
We recently dyno tested a 369sxe single vs. 366sxe single same-day, same-fueling, same-turbine housing on my Junker Drag Truck, and we ended up with a 6% peak power difference, not the flow map predicted 14% difference. Next round of testing will be with a larger exhaust housing setup and T4 manifold to test the theory that turbine flow is somewhat limiting the 369sxe and not allowing it to make the full 14% increase over the 366sxe.
If you believe flow is the only aspect that has a bearing on power potential, don't be surprised when the results don't match the claims. Comparing box turbochargers isn't going to get you very far in understanding the importance of different design aspects and how they influence power in varying applications.
__________________
Infinite Performance
 
Old 12-03-2016, 02:04 PM   #15
79fordcrew

Name: 79fordcrew
Title: Banned
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2014
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 130
What about a gta4202 would it flow enough to support 1000hp under a 62
 
Old 12-03-2016, 04:30 PM   #16
Big Blue24
 
Big Blue24's Avatar

Name: Big Blue24
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedar City, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79fordcrew View Post
What about a gta4202 would it flow enough to support 1000hp under a 62
No, those GTA4202's flow a touch less than a 369sxe, the ball bearing version GT4202R flows mid 90's LBS per minute:

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
95' 2wd Junker Drag Truck
1502 HP Fuel-Only 12mm P7100 Pump
SXE 472 over GTX55 116mm
OEM 12v Block
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:13 AM   #17
jlbayes
 
jlbayes's Avatar

Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Blue24 View Post
Why would you assert that our 690 HP dyno pull had a 25% correction factor and therefore absolutely will not support 800 to 1000 HP, then later post that an S480 or comparable primary will support the 1000 HP power goal?

By your math, our 690 HP after a 25% reduction = 552 raw HP from the "poor flowing" 369sxe that roughly flows 100 lbs per minute.

So using your math, the S480 which roughly flows 120 lbs per minute or 20% more should support a whopping 662 HP or nowhere near the original poster's power goal.

Free internet-based education is just that, free. Real education comes from hours of testing, studying reliable materials, and reflection/pondering the data, creating theories, then more testing. I will admit that I enjoy reading internet based data and power numbers from other shops, other dynos, and other trucks. It is fun to bench race dynos, compare numbers, compare time slips, etc. At the end of the day, testing turbos on the same truck with the same dyno is the best way to see trends and gather data to form theories and project power numbers.

This is internet advice, so take it for what it's worth, we generally see 7hp raw "uncorrected" at the tire per LB of air moved by the turbo on a mechanical injection 12v cummins and 8hp raw "uncorrected" per LB of air moved by the turbo on a well-tuned common rail. These are attainable realistic numbers that most trucks can achieve.

For 1000 HP on a 12v Cummins, we'd recommend a turbo system capable of 142 lbs per minute

For 1000 HP on a Common Rail, we'd recommend a turbo system capable of 125 lbs per minute which is still a little larger than an S480. Not that a few perfectly tuned common rails haven't hit 1k HP with an S480 spun off the map, just that you really need 125 lbs per minute to do it reliably on most trucks.
Considering that primary has done 1k hp on multiple dynos with track numbers to back it and not using ridiculous correction factors. I wonder where that statement came from. Take the industrial injection style advertising somewhere else. Gimme a break.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:42 AM   #18
zfaylor
 
zfaylor's Avatar

Name: zfaylor
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: P-TOWN!, Indiana
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 5,024
Are we implying that the S369 is a more capable turbo than the GTA4202/gt4202 ?
__________________
2015 half ton heavy chevy
81 Fairmont LS project
Many yard ornament projects...

North American Turbo
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:44 AM   #19
jlbayes
 
jlbayes's Avatar

Name: jlbayes
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: michigan
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by zfaylor View Post
Are we implying that the S369 is a more capable turbo than the GTA4202/gt4202 ?
The maths says so, so it must be true.
__________________
Jacob, 97 rclb
 
Old 02-09-2017, 06:47 PM   #20
Thekid760
 
Thekid760's Avatar

Name: Thekid760
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 475
what would a gta4202 be capable of supporting?

Seems like 600-700hp isnt too unreasonable?
__________________
95 3500 4x4 5spd 4.10
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.

 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024, CompetitionDiesel.com
all information found on this site is property of www.competitiondiesel.com