Advertisement
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Home Who's Online Today's Posts HP Calculator CompD Gift Shop Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together > Tech Area- Dodge > Dodge Tech > 94-98 2nd Gen. 12V
Register Members List Timeslips EFI Live Library Invite Your Friends FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2007, 02:06 PM   #21
Soup Nazi
 
Soup Nazi's Avatar

Name: Soup Nazi
Title: The artist formerly known as Don M
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,197
J,

The stock plug is what determines the total travel if everything else is removed. i.e, rack stop plate, AFC, governor travel is maxed, etc.

Adding a Mack truck plug, machining the stock plug or stacking copper washers...whatever method is used will allow more forward travel if all the other things are allowing it.

That number could vary from pump to pump just from set up and machining tolerances of the pump itself.

In the end, one could add a plug and get more travel, but you can overtravel the rack and ultimately the plunger ( past the spill port ) and just dump the pressure earlier than wanted.

IMO, the stock plug is best!

Rack travel way out there 21mm's is doing very little or no good anyway. The fuel is late in the cylce, the smoke and late burning fuel/heat just goes up and up.
 
Old 08-15-2007, 02:17 PM   #22
Eastern Diesel
 
Eastern Diesel's Avatar

Name: Eastern Diesel
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 258
Schoust Im trying to get my pump tuned without pulling it back off but if I do have to pull it ill let you know about the rack plug.
 
Old 08-15-2007, 02:45 PM   #23
Bobcat698
 
Bobcat698's Avatar

Name: Bobcat698
Title: Pure Diesel Power
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Marshfield, WI
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,229
I know going from a tuned 887 pump with stock rack plug at 468ccs my egts were HOTTER than with my tuned 180 pump with 2095 rack plug and 640ccs... plungers must be turned too far.
__________________
Pure Diesel Power
715-254-1833
 
Old 08-15-2007, 04:10 PM   #24
JGK
 
JGK's Avatar

Name: JGK
Title: Been around
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soup Nazi
J,

The stock plug is what determines the total travel if everything else is removed. i.e, rack stop plate, AFC, governor travel is maxed, etc.

Adding a Mack truck plug, machining the stock plug or stacking copper washers...whatever method is used will allow more forward travel if all the other things are allowing it.

That number could vary from pump to pump just from set up and machining tolerances of the pump itself.

In the end, one could add a plug and get more travel, but you can overtravel the rack and ultimately the plunger ( past the spill port ) and just dump the pressure earlier than wanted.

IMO, the stock plug is best!

Rack travel way out there 21mm's is doing very little or no good anyway. The fuel is late in the cylce, the smoke and late burning fuel/heat just goes up and up.
Hmmm. This is very interesting. When they showed me the rack travel on my 215 pump with the dial indicator, the indicator was measuring the rack movement through the plug hole - the plug was removed. The rack was moved manually through its full range and 21 mm was all it would go. The head tech said you could run the pump without any plug at all and it would make no difference (presumably, other than a little oil leakage). The plug is just a concave cap (which I saw) and doesn't contact the rack, according to him.

Guess I need to go back and make sure I didn't misunderstand them.

Thanks for your input,
-Jay
 
Old 08-15-2007, 05:11 PM   #25
Soup Nazi
 
Soup Nazi's Avatar

Name: Soup Nazi
Title: The artist formerly known as Don M
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGK
Hmmm. This is very interesting. When they showed me the rack travel on my 215 pump with the dial indicator, the indicator was measuring the rack movement through the plug hole - the plug was removed. The rack was moved manually through its full range and 21 mm was all it would go. The head tech said you could run the pump without any plug at all and it would make no difference (presumably, other than a little oil leakage). The plug is just a concave cap (which I saw) and doesn't contact the rack, according to him.

Guess I need to go back and make sure I didn't misunderstand them.

Thanks for your input,
-Jay
If the plug is removed, there is a small machined part that stabilizes the control rod that will fall out. The machined piece is round and has an "L" shape in the center that matches the control rods geometry or "L" shape. The plug holds this piece in place. The piece is called by Bosch a "guide bushing"

If you were to remove the plate, AFC, etc and hold the rack forward using the accel lever you could unscrew the plug and watch the plungers move even further forward or actualy rotate further. At least this is true in the pumps I have built here.

I could see where differing pieces with differing machined tolerance could prove this untrue in some cases.

In the end, the rack/control rod does not need to be that far forward anyway, it is fruitless.
 
Old 08-15-2007, 11:22 PM   #26
Hammer
 
Hammer's Avatar

Name: Hammer
Title: Verbal Junk Author
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
The guy that did my pump marked where my plate is set at 500cc but that is 18.5mm of rack travel. So I moved slid the plate back some more it should be around 17mm now.
500cc's at how many strokes and with what injectors di he use for your test stand?.Also,at what boost does he have the AFC set to allow the rack to go into full travel.How far up the rpm band does this "500cc" of fuel pull too?.

Personally,it sounds like a tuning issue and a set of mismatched injectors.IF one ran 500cc of fuel with a set of his injector and then you slap the pump in your truck,with your injectors,who knows what its flowing and where its flowing at.Also,the purpose of having a pump done on a stand it to maximize your fuel systems potential,if you do not add all the parts and then go monkeying around with the setup,who knows where your at and what you would make........Andy
 
Old 08-17-2007, 11:55 AM   #27
inline6359

Name: inline6359
Title: Microwaving cats since 01
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western PA
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,043
If i have the stock rack plug and no plate will i still lose cc's after 17mm?

How can i measure my rack travel and where?
__________________
"If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it"-Einstein
 
Old 08-17-2007, 02:02 PM   #28
JGK
 
JGK's Avatar

Name: JGK
Title: Been around
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soup Nazi
If the plug is removed, there is a small machined part that stabilizes the control rod that will fall out. The machined piece is round and has an "L" shape in the center that matches the control rods geometry or "L" shape. The plug holds this piece in place. The piece is called by Bosch a "guide bushing"

If you were to remove the plate, AFC, etc and hold the rack forward using the accel lever you could unscrew the plug and watch the plungers move even further forward or actualy rotate further. At least this is true in the pumps I have built here...
Don,

I spoke with the Bosch tech to get a more detailed explanation of this, and you are entirely correct that there is such a bushing. In fact there are two, one at the front and one at back of the pump and they do indeed keep the rack in proper alignment. He said if you remove the foreward one, the rack will drop a bit, so it must be there to keep things properly aligned. In fact, he said running the pump without the guide could cause the forward plunger to come out of index with the rack at full travel and thus when you took your foot off the throttle, that plunger would stay wide open!! Yee haw!

However, he said, it does not restrict rack travel to something less than 21 mm nor does its removal allow it to go more than 21 mm. Rack travel is dictated entirely by the stop pin through the rack at the back of the pump where the other guide bushing is.

As to Smokem's comment about the restricted fueling past 17 mm, he had no comment. He had not actually measured fuel output relative to the helix and spill port interaction at various points of rack travel in that range, particularly with respect to the different pumps (215 with the notch vs 180 vs 160, etc.) So Smokem's observation could be entirely right on.

Inline6359,

I think, if I understand Smokem and the tech's comments correctly, with no plate, or a 0 plate, you will see increasing output of fuel beyond 17 mm. Just that with the 215 pump, it may not be a linear increase compared to the other pumps due to the notch. The increase may fall off a bit more quickly with the 215. But it will flow a huge amount. The tech measured the output of my pump at 418 cc per 1000 strokes at 2000 engine rpm equivalent with the governor lever fully forward in the deepest point in my #10 plate, which was fully forward. The gauge showed 20.1 mm rack travel, just .9 mm shy of smacking the stop pin. Just be aware that running with no plate will allow the rack to hit the pin, and that can break it eventually.

The best way to measure rack travel is through the hole in the front with the plug removed. But, of course, you have to remove the pump! However, you may be able to come up with a creative way of measuring it through the stop plate hole. The tech said that with the plate removed and the fuel lever up, you can move the rack fully forward to its maximum point by pushing the lever forward till it stops. The trick is finding some way to measure this point. Perhaps from the front of the plate hole to the front edge of the lever? I don't know. I haven't tried yet.

-Jay
 
Old 08-17-2007, 04:29 PM   #29
Soup Nazi
 
Soup Nazi's Avatar

Name: Soup Nazi
Title: The artist formerly known as Don M
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,197
The easiest way to see the continued forward movement of the control rod ( rack ) by changing the plug is to:

1) Remove a DV holder and DV
2) Remove the AFC housing and the stop plate
3) Slightly loosen the plug, but dont take it out

While looking down into the plunger, move the accel lever forward and slowly unscrew the plug. You will see the plunger rotate further as the plug is loosened outward.

When we disassemble pumps here, we leave the control rod in the housing before we put it in the cleaner. This makes the afformentioned steps very easy to see. One can insert the guide bushing in the front and install the plug, push the rod forward and loosen the plug and get a good amount of additional travel.

But again, you dont need that much travel in nearly all cases. I use less than 10 on the street with my big pump and under 17 on small pumps
__________________

 
Old 08-17-2007, 04:45 PM   #30
AsTroSS
 
AsTroSS's Avatar

Name: AsTroSS
Title: problems start @80 psi
Status: Not Here
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Europe
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 4,327
Looks like good time to ask few questions about *big* pump,


Do you have Bosch pn for 13mm barrel/plunger and Bosch pn for best bosch pump cam(or aftermarket)?


My mailbox is open for advices
__________________
Ram 2500 '98 QC 12V Cummins 4x4 automatic --->project: T-25
Ram 1500 ‘ 97 QC 12V Cummins conversion 4x4 automatic - ->project: T-15
Superb '21 -TDI 2.0 CR-205hp
 
Old 08-18-2007, 03:06 PM   #31
inline6359

Name: inline6359
Title: Microwaving cats since 01
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western PA
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,043
**** your mailbox, i wanna hear to.
__________________
"If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it"-Einstein
 
Old 08-20-2007, 09:18 AM   #32
JGK
 
JGK's Avatar

Name: JGK
Title: Been around
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokem
... Breaking the stop pin in the rack should not be an issue, substantial force would be hard to produce for pin breakage.
But entirely possible. That appears to be what took out my governor. The broken pin was found in the bottom of the governor housing! I have always run with a stop plate, a #10 for the last 2 or 3 years, and not fully forward. So as far as I know I wasn't hitting the pin at WOT. But it broke somehow.

-Jay
 
Old 08-21-2007, 08:37 AM   #33
JGK
 
JGK's Avatar

Name: JGK
Title: Been around
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soup Nazi
The easiest way to see the continued forward movement of the control rod ( rack ) by changing the plug is to:

1) Remove a DV holder and DV
2) Remove the AFC housing and the stop plate
3) Slightly loosen the plug, but dont take it out

While looking down into the plunger, move the accel lever forward and slowly unscrew the plug. You will see the plunger rotate further as the plug is loosened outward.

When we disassemble pumps here, we leave the control rod in the housing before we put it in the cleaner. This makes the afformentioned steps very easy to see. One can insert the guide bushing in the front and install the plug, push the rod forward and loosen the plug and get a good amount of additional travel.
Don,

Yesterday, I asked the tech if he had observed this. He said he had never tried, so it may be true, just that he hadn't done what you described. I wish he had a P-pump on the stand cuz I would have insisted we go tinker! But he said the rack is relatively soft metal (aluminum?) and suggested if the rack was bumping into the plug, or something restrained by the plug, the end of the rack would show evidence of the impacts over time. Have you found any indication on the end of the rack that it is hitting something, and what that might be - threaded edge of the plug, for instance?

Thanks,
-Jay
 
Old 08-21-2007, 09:39 AM   #34
Signature600
 
Signature600's Avatar

Name: Signature600
Title: THA MAN!
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 11,974
I'm guessing I can measure the rack travel on my pump but removing the plug, and putting a dial indicator on the rack??

I've been fighting a low power problem for a long time...since this pump was tuned. 913 pump, 19*, 2095 rack plug, no plate or AFC guts, 022 DV's, DDP4's, 6K Springs = 378hp

So, in my feeble little mind, I'm thinking that:
1. Too much rack travel
2. I can't get the thing to idle or run right below 2500RPM...almost misses, we'll call it a big lope, but above that it smooths out!

So I'm gonna do a little tinkering when I have it off, like putting a new AFC on it, and tuning it, and trying to figure out exactly how much rack travel I have. Any pointers??

Chris
__________________


THANKS TO:
Tim Barber @ TRE Diesel
Jeff Mumau @ Mumau Diesel Service
Rip @ Source Automotive
Don Thuren @ ThurenFab Suspension
Columbus Diesel Supply

 
Old 08-21-2007, 12:04 PM   #35
Bobcat698
 
Bobcat698's Avatar

Name: Bobcat698
Title: Pure Diesel Power
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Marshfield, WI
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokem
Most views are that if you use no fuel plate the pin in the rack will break, you have always used a fuel plate and yet your dislodged itself correct? I would not call the rack material relatively soft, if the rack has contacted the plug it should be visible in the base.
I had the rack plug install farmed out last year as I didn't have time to do it myself, the shop argued with me that the rack wouldn't hit the stock plug and that they had tested it on another pump.
I told them not to worry about it, just do what I tell them. I enjoyed the look on the tech's face when he saw the wear marks on the stock plug
__________________
Pure Diesel Power
715-254-1833
 
Old 08-21-2007, 05:14 PM   #36
Schoust
 
Schoust's Avatar

Name: Schoust
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2007
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 742
How much more fuel would a 160 pump produce with the addition of the Mack rack plug?
__________________
07 QC Big Horn 5.9 auto Completely stock so far...
 
Old 08-22-2007, 09:52 AM   #37
Soup Nazi
 
Soup Nazi's Avatar

Name: Soup Nazi
Title: The artist formerly known as Don M
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Signature600
I'm guessing I can measure the rack travel on my pump but removing the plug, and putting a dial indicator on the rack??

I've been fighting a low power problem for a long time...since this pump was tuned. 913 pump, 19*, 2095 rack plug, no plate or AFC guts, 022 DV's, DDP4's, 6K Springs = 378hp

So, in my feeble little mind, I'm thinking that:
1. Too much rack travel
2. I can't get the thing to idle or run right below 2500RPM...almost misses, we'll call it a big lope, but above that it smooths out!

So I'm gonna do a little tinkering when I have it off, like putting a new AFC on it, and tuning it, and trying to figure out exactly how much rack travel I have. Any pointers??

Chris
The funky idle is the gov. Get the crazy springs out and use either a 3 or 4K kit.

Install the AFC, stock AFC spring, and the fuel plate. Install a normal rack plug too. The 181 DV's are fine, but I know some like the other stuff.
__________________

 
Old 08-22-2007, 01:57 PM   #38
Signature600
 
Signature600's Avatar

Name: Signature600
Title: THA MAN!
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 11,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soup Nazi
The funky idle is the gov. Get the crazy springs out and use either a 3 or 4K kit.

Install the AFC, stock AFC spring, and the fuel plate. Install a normal rack plug too. The 181 DV's are fine, but I know some like the other stuff.
That's the plan Don...if I ever get parts to put the rest of it back together!

Chris
__________________


THANKS TO:
Tim Barber @ TRE Diesel
Jeff Mumau @ Mumau Diesel Service
Rip @ Source Automotive
Don Thuren @ ThurenFab Suspension
Columbus Diesel Supply

 
Old 08-25-2007, 12:52 PM   #39
KTA-Cummins

Name: KTA-Cummins
Title: Diesel Doctor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shelby County, Ky
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 203
I love the wild CC numbers thrown around in this thread. I had a customer get his pump tuned at a local diesel shop its a 180hp pump with flat top 12mm plungers they told him they had it now fueling to 600+cc's. I said yeah right!! Well he put the pump back on the truck and it cleans up the fuel at 420rwhp. I gave him one of my pumps set at 400cc for a demo, and he had to turn the fuel down to keep from drowning it out. Oh and Don~ is right I am afraid adding the more rack travel isn't going to gain you more power as those extra cc's of fuel come too late in the combustion cycle to add any power. If you need more fuel I recommend going to a bigger plunger and running less rack travel. By doing that your injection event for the same quantity of fuel is shorter so you make more power.
 
Old 08-26-2007, 08:57 AM   #40
Schoust
 
Schoust's Avatar

Name: Schoust
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2007
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 742
So Kta are you saying that the MACK plug mod in a 160 pump is not going to net any more power because the extra fuel is coming to late in the combustion cycle??
__________________
07 QC Big Horn 5.9 auto Completely stock so far...

Last edited by Schoust; 08-26-2007 at 09:00 AM.
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.

 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024, CompetitionDiesel.com
all information found on this site is property of www.competitiondiesel.com