6.7 block variants

Ah, now the master baiter comes in. :hehe:
Now the whole storyline is gonna' take off. LOL
ZIP! ZOOM! To the moon! :D

I didn't know a Nebraska Farmer was supposed to be so... inexperienced.

Guess you gotta' live in the east and Texas to "Be Big". :bs:

Mark.
 
9724VF350 said:
To clarify I meant for dedicated sled pulling trucks. It may still beat your brains out, I'm not sure.

I've also wondered about filling them with a lightweight solid. Balance beads, ect. Just something to reduce the air volume used.
Click to expand...

If they are completely full it works. We put them on the front of a street truck and ran them a 70mph and couldn't tell anything different. Ran them on a puller with a 40ish MPh final with no problems. You just have to take 600 or so pound of weight box so we did away with it.
 
Mark Nixon said:
Ah, now the master baiter comes in. :hehe:
Now the whole storyline is gonna' take off. LOL
ZIP! ZOOM! To the moon! :D

I didn't know a Nebraska Farmer was supposed to be so... inexperienced.

Guess you gotta' live in the east and Texas to "Be Big". :bs:

Mark.
Click to expand...


Mark, I really don't care what profession he's in....He brought it up. I just said that if he needs to add "ballast" to the front of his truck towing, that he has a lot to learn....I guess if you disagree with that as well, then I guess the statement holds true.

I'm not trying to pick a fight, but people like this kid bring down the greatest forum for diesel sports that I have been a part of, or that I know exists...anyone can ask a question if they would like to know answers and opinions...but if they ask that question knowing full well that they know more than the people answering, then I have no use for that person. It's happened around here a lot lately.


I'm not saying I'm God's gift to anything, my profession included, I'm far from it...but neither is this kidd....

Chris
 
I'll admit, I've laughed at this thread. New guy a little quick to get wound up. If he meant adding weight to the front for more traction in the field, plausible, but if he's talking about adding weight for hauling on the road, yeah probably not the best idea.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
J-Pipes said:
I'll admit, I've laughed at this thread. New guy a little quick to get wound up. If he meant adding weight to the front for more traction in the field, plausible, but if he's talking about adding weight for hauling on the road, yeah probably not the best idea.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Still, even in the field?? The trailer should transfer weight to the front of the truck....I know my truck doesn't shoot the moon loaded...maybe I'm doing something wrong?

Chris
 
farmkidd said:
Well looky there, its another loud mouth from TX talking about how smart he is......stereotypes are real aren't they Wunderwood? Too bad you couldn't find a better pic of your Momma to use for your avatar. Please explain to me what YOU have done to "earn" so much respect? & if you are feeling so tough, you are more than welcome to come on up, I'll wait.
Click to expand...

If you read ( and re-read) what I wrote, I said nothing about how smart I am. Being a moderator on this forum (also, you are welcome for the new avatar!) I've seen it happen numerous times, where the young and tough new kid on the block (you) has seen and done it all, yet asks for opinions, and then gets defensive when he doesn't like what he hears. But keep on being the internet bad ass. Also, I see you are between Ansley and Westerville, is that correct? How big a boy are ya?
 
Last edited:
Signature600 said:
Still, even in the field?? The trailer should transfer weight to the front of the truck....I know my truck doesn't shoot the moon loaded...maybe I'm doing something wrong?

Chris
Click to expand...
Oh I don't mean it definitely useful, just sorta along the line of thinking that some tractors needs some extra weight up front on occasion, it possible that a "field use" truck could benefit. It would admittedly have to be a poorly balanced load, but still possible I suppose, like winning the lottery!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
J-Pipes said:
Oh I don't mean it definitely useful, just sorta along the line of thinking that some tractors needs some extra weight up front on occasion, it possible that a "field use" truck could benefit. It would admittedly have to be a poorly balanced load, but still possible I suppose, like winning the lottery!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I knew you meant tractors...but I have to spread the fun around...

Chris:poke:
 
All in good fun!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Signature600 said:
I knew you meant tractors...but I have to spread the fun around...

Chris:poke:
Click to expand...
Quick detour on tractors, seen an orange duetz the other day, was told that was when the merged, had a full rack of weights on the front! That something that interest you guys? Not sure if it's for sale, but will be calling the guy about something else, could ask for more info for you.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Depends what it is...The very last Allis Chalmers tractors had Deutz-Allis badges, then once AGCO bought them they went back to Orange with Deutz-Allis badges.

See what it is either way.
Chris
 
I apologize to Sig600, I took offense at his calling me Bud, and I shouldnt have. When I mentioned adding ballast I was thinking of a couple weeks prior when I went to the neighbors to bring home his 20ton SpreadALL manure spreader and our 16ton SpreadALL spreader. These are designed to be hitched to a tractor drawbar. So the put a lot of weight even empty on the backend of your pickup.
 
farmkidd said:
When I mentioned adding ballast I was thinking of a couple weeks prior when I went to the neighbors to bring home his 20ton SpreadALL manure spreader and our 16ton SpreadALL spreader. These are designed to be hitched to a tractor drawbar. So the put a lot of weight even empty on the backend of your pickup.
Click to expand...

On that subject, I've wanted to build a delivery truck that has a 8' bed, but shove the axle back so the tires are about 1" from the bumper. You'd have to do 4 link/trailing arm/ect suspension to get it back that far, but it would shorten the center of axle to hitch pin length by 12-18 inches. The difference in handling drawbar pulled equipment would be unbelievable.
 
9724VF350 said:
On that subject, I've wanted to build a delivery truck that has a 8' bed, but shove the axle back so the tires are about 1" from the bumper. You'd have to do 4 link/trailing arm/ect suspension to get it back that far, but it would shorten the center of axle to hitch pin length by 12-18 inches. The difference in handling drawbar pulled equipment would be unbelievable.
Click to expand...

We just use an FL80 with about 5 ton of concrete block on the bed. Air ride truck holds up whatever you hook to, and you have enough truck to stop whatever you're pulling.


Your idea would be killer for most things as well, just we don't have much time to work on our own stuff, so we make things work as we need.
Chris
 
Am I the only one curious what bro-douchery would have to take place to get a rear gear to clear the cab?

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
 
biggy238 said:
Am I the only one curious what bro-douchery would have to take place to get a rear gear to clear the cab?

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
None in most cases, I suppose it depends on what its going in and how the motor mounts are setup. We just had a 92 f-250 truck leave our shop with an industrial 5.9 with 4 speed Allison behind it. Fit rather nice, the trans selection leaves something to be desired though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top