I caught this before I left.
My excuse is I must be inferior to the all mighty powerfull Charles...
All hail Charles...
He is the all knowing and powerfull oz...
You know this all has been very amusing to me and I have laughed my ass off today.
But honestly, is that all you can do is pick at how it looks?? You can't pick at how it functions as you have NO CLUE other than the theory you have in your head since you have never tried it before.
Um, no. Best case.... it works as well as a mid to large frame single. I guess we should all be ecstatic.
At the end of the day it's a single freakin stage dude. You can't make boost fly out your ass, the compressor wheels do it, and you only have ONE STAGE of compression going on. Holy simplicity. This is NOT a mystery. Well, except for you.
Have you ever looked into some of the highest HP turboed engines out there to see just what type of system they are running?? I am betting you find alot of stuff on the net that will show PARALLELS are being run on alot of those engines. Aparently there must be a reason for this but I am sure in your head they are all going to wrong also.
Alrighty. Guess you missed the 10 other times this has been explained to your ass... THOSE guys are moving a LOT of air, being that most of them will be large cube engines spinning over TWICE your rpm.... on top of this, they have very GOOD headflow and a very GOOD selection of camshafts and intake manifolding that all lead to very GOOD VE. All things allowing high power at "low" boost. Also..... in case you missed it..... those are all things you DON'T have! THEY would do well to parallel the stage because they can move the air at sub 60psi, and they can't find a single charger that can move that kind of air. You CAN! (DA)
And you can go on all you want about them being hard to spool in a single stage and not good to drive.:blahblah1: Well honestly who gives a **** since the truck will NEVER be driven on the road again?? So that excuse does not meen a dam thing to me. And you know if I am not happy with the results with just the two then I have a large #3 setting here that can always be added to the mix.
So you don't care how it performs.... Why are you even building it again? Looks went out the window a long, long time ago.
You or anyone else on here has a clue about anything that is going on with this truck other than the welds look bad and you do not like the stack setup. So if that is all building a performance engine is about then I guess there are alot of people out there that have been going at it all wrong for a long time.
Dude, it's called CRAFTSMANSHIP..... why don't you go check out a professional race car sometime. Better yet, send those pictures to any race team in Nascar, or the NHRA and get back to me on how they receive your idea of a "performance" engine, and how it should look/go together...
I have a suggestion, why not back up and watch and see what happens and if what we are doing does not work and I actually do fail in the end everyone will know it and then you all can give me all the **** you want. Heck I will even make sure I post up on all the forums how big of a flop this project was.
Again..... only YOU wonder as to whether or not it will "work". Everyone else with any grasp on turbocharging already KNOWS that you have a glorified freakin single charger. Only difference is that you have to WORK to ensure you don't undershoot that somehow with the myriad of variability/reliability issues you have introduced with your contraption.
I am out of here for the night...
I here beer and steak calling my name at the roadhouse...:Cheer: