62/65/14 over 80/96/1.32...

josh03

josh03

don't ask
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
168
Who has run this combo; 62/65/14 gated over a 80/96/1.32? What are the limitations/problems with the setup? Benefits? Possibly a quick spooling set? Thanks
 
dual stock pumps and whichever size nozzles will go good with the combo. Somewhere in the range of 50-60lpm?
 
thinking I might want to find a 62/71 secondary instead, if the 65 will restrict it too much
 
i think you would be better off with that second choice in a 62(or even a 64) but a 71 ex side has a much better flow for backpressure.. that being said that 65 would spool really fast and add ex gate to it and have the best of all..
i have a ex gate for real cheap that im not going to use now
 
Use a 62/74 or 64/74 you won't regret it
Also talk to chris at ed and get a 1.10 housing built rather than the 1.32

That was my same set and made over 800 easy
 
I like my 62/71/13ss over my 80/96/1.32

But I'd love to find out what an 1.10 housing on my s480 would do for drivability and smoke control...
 
josh03 said:
Who has run this combo; 62/65/14 gated over a 80/96/1.32? What are the limitations/problems with the setup? Benefits? Possibly a quick spooling set? Thanks
Click to expand...

should work great. 1138 on fuel has been done with the 62/65 non wg t3/big external gate and a bigger primary.
 
Big Swole said:
I like my 62/71/13ss over my 80/96/1.32

But I'd love to find out what an 1.10 housing on my s480 would do for drivability and smoke control...
Click to expand...

Yeah I loved it, smoke control more like smoke less

DEZLFREK said:
is the 1.10 the next step down from the 1.32?
Click to expand...

I would in no way call it a step down more like optimized for what we use the chargers for rather than a cheap housing BW ships them with
 
I would in no way call it a step down more like optimized for what we use the chargers for rather than a cheap housing BW ships them with[/QUOTE]

ok maybe i missworded it as a "step down" but yes i meant the next housing size smaller. I think i am going to give it a shot. I would like to see some more p/r coming out of my 491 and im not running the rpm or fuel to spin it to hard yet.. i should maybe wait for my pump to get done do see but im thinking the 1.32 is a bit to loose to make it very efficient on our sized motors.. i guess ill see soon enough..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top