Well then. That's just cheating! LOL
I bet it will pay off at the tree.For real! two stages of compression and only one turbine to fight! It will be interesting to see if the awesome response and insane boost/drive ratio's will make up for the crank loss of turning the supercharger. very excited to see future results of this build!
We will see. Dont see anybody else going outside of the box and trying it. I know theres some loss but gains in other areas.
Believe it or not I've had the best luck with a standard s475. 96/88 t6 1.32, drive at 30-40 was half of boost 70-80 across the board. Never staged and launched at the track but it was a rocket ship out of the hole leaving at 25lbs.
With the s588 boost is at 80 lbs peak with drive around 60-80 , still tuning and trying different things but its an animal. I believe due to the difference of a .85 a/r on the s5 compared to the 1.32 s4 is why drive rises faster and ends up higher, so far egts are in check with this s500.
Ok, I'm confused...
You were able to get 80psi out of a 75mm compressor, with 30-40psi drive pressure on a 88mm turbine....as a single?
How is it that I can throw 50psi drive to a 80-84mm compressor, with the same turbine wheel and housing as you, and only get 30-35psi boost out of it in a compound setup?
Wouldn't/shouldn't the pressure out of the primary be higher than 30-35psi?
Doesn't the secondary act as a restriction in the airflow, which would cause the pressure to rise? (Boost pressure is restriction pressure, right?)
Believe it or not I've had the best luck with a standard s475. 96/88 t6 1.32, drive at 30-40 was half of boost 70-80 across the board. Never staged and launched at the track but it was a rocket ship out of the hole leaving at 25lbs.
With the s588 boost is at 80 lbs peak with drive around 60-80 , still tuning and trying different things but its an animal. I believe due to the difference of a .85 a/r on the s5 compared to the 1.32 s4 is why drive rises faster and ends up higher, so far egts are in check with this s500.