True twin turbo on a cummins, not compounds.

It seems it is a lot of work to come out with the same results as a properly matched single.

But somebody mentioned the Hamilton Head with a rowdy Hamilton cam could change the scenario of this idea. Could you please go into more details, but again it seems that a big single may be a better option.

I don't always post to the forum but when I do, I prefer a Kindle Fire
 
Smokem said:
Why would it matter which engine was used?
Click to expand...

engine bay layout, displacement, exhaust pulses per revolution, etc.

parallels will work fine on an I6 if done correctly. see BMW.

For MOST people, it's not worth the time/money/effort/etc. I would venture to say that the guys who are capable of making it work well aren't posting up on the internet asking how to do it. What say you?
 
this subject has been discussed before. want pics, here you go:

SEMA2007007-2.jpg


SEMA2007006-2.jpg
 
There was a thread somewhere with a triple turbo EFR 6.7. Iirc they guy said it wan the same if not better than the old twin setup.


Sent from my iPhone during class
 
Forrest and Weston agree on something!?!?!?

SOMEONE LOOK OUT A WINDOW AND TELL ME IF PIGS ARE FLYING OR THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END, OR BOTH!!!! HOLY CAT CHIT!!!!
 
WUnderwood said:
Forrest and Weston agree on something!?!?!?

SOMEONE LOOK OUT A WINDOW AND TELL ME IF PIGS ARE FLYING OR THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END, OR BOTH!!!! HOLY CAT CHIT!!!!
Click to expand...

Are you confusing Weston and Taylor? :p

Weston and I see eye to eye on pretty much everything. We just advocate a different devil while doing so.
 
Smokem said:
Did they try staging the turbine housing AR ratios?
Click to expand...

I dunno. It was so long ago for them that they weren't really interested in discussing it too much, since they already had something that worked much better and they could just talk about it that.

I think parallel twins would work fine on a Cummins considering the tech we have today, but a big single is just so much easier. And less fab usually beats more fab every time if the results are the same.
 
I'm betting one day someone will show up one day at some dyno event with this setup. There's always gona be someone out there that wants to be different and do what others don't agree with.
 
I would bet two he341 or he351cw turbo with a 9cm exhaust housing would spool somewhat similar to the old 18cm turbined h1c turbo on a stock ve pumped 1st gen.
 
mattpopp said:
It seems it is a lot of work to come out with the same results as a properly matched single.

But somebody mentioned the Hamilton Head with a rowdy Hamilton cam could change the scenario of this idea. Could you please go into more details, but again it seems that a big single may be a better option.

I don't always post to the forum but when I do, I prefer a Kindle Fire
Click to expand...

Why? Are you really that damn bored? Do something productive you big twat..... :kick:
 
WUnderwood said:
Forrest and Weston agree on something!?!?!?

SOMEONE LOOK OUT A WINDOW AND TELL ME IF PIGS ARE FLYING OR THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END, OR BOTH!!!! HOLY CAT CHIT!!!!
Click to expand...

Oddly enough, there is a police helicopter out my back window now...does that count???
 
crackerman said:
I would bet two he341 or he351cw turbo with a 9cm exhaust housing would spool somewhat similar to the old 18cm turbined h1c turbo on a stock ve pumped 1st gen.
Click to expand...

I don't believe simple addition applies here. If it did though, you'd have a ~120/160/18 LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top