turbine would be way more cooler...
damn you, and your taunts ... yeah, mebbe in another life.
Miss Geico has THREE pairs of T78 for sale, cheap.
turbine would be way more cooler...
I have NO idea what you and Oldestof11 are talking about. <grump>
well, what ya waitin for?
Reducing internal stress on the motor. However they become difficult to start once decompressed to a certain level hence the term "ether baby".
A stock Cummins is between 17:1 and 18:1.
Down to about 13:1 is what bigger sled pullers do.
you asked for different engines. Thought about the International DT366 and DT466?
No, I hadn't, and it was a booger-bear to find specs on them, but that 7.6L looks interesting, esp at 700kg.
Does anybody make them into a (mechanical) performance engine? Will heads stay together at 32-3300 rpm and 2-3 Bar.
I come from a Cat/Wauk/DDA world and surely do like wet cylinders, generally.
Hypermax is one.
I have worked on the IH engines a long time. They are going to be heavier than a Cummins engine. The IH 466 is large. You could use a 8.3 Cummins then. They would be overkill.
Nothing about the fuel system would be different than what you already want. I dont see any gains with this.
Can you still get your hands on the 7.3 and 8.1L 4 cylinder cummins? I've always wondered what those could make for hp, although harmonics on a 4cyl are terrible and probably would destroy the boat parts lol
A duramax would be a great engine for that boat, they have been putting a few in some of the bigger poker run boats and have been doing well.
company I worked for had a DT466 in a fertilizer spreader truck that turned 3200 at 45mph, it got driven everywhere like that with the pedal on the floor, last I checked it had been going 20 years like that.
I'd put my money on a DT466 holding 800 HP for hours on end long before a 5.9, horsepower is like toothpaste, the bigger tube you have the harder you can squeeze it and the longer it'll last.