NADM 2.6 rules-draft

Well it would be something more 3.0 guys would have to chime in with since they know there next steps or things they could do, but water injection? Like I said I can't talk w great knowledge on the 3.0 class and what they could do
 
My thoughts behind this is 2.5 is growing everywhere so adding that class keeping 2.6 current then growing 3.0 would give a great 3 class show but that's just my opinion
 
Ok well then something even though I dont know what that would be? Nothing like an incomplete idea huh? Hana all I know is if 2.6 doesn't stay current and keeps changing soon enough it'll be 2.5 and run what you brung
 
So open driveline with springs and traction bars and stops or are you saying ridged rears as well? Well I guess 90% of the trucks in 2.6 at scheid were ridged anyways LOL
 
Loose the air to water and you will loose the hx60 turbos which will bring the power down substantially. Leave the duals for now just cause the hp won't be there to fully utilize the 35" tires anyway.
 
ILLINOISRAM said:
Loose the air to water and you will loose the hx60 turbos which will bring the power down substantially. Leave the duals for now just cause the hp won't be there to fully utilize the 35" tires anyway.
Click to expand...

I think u will still see the hx60 turbos, there were guys running the 60s with air to air before.
 
I heard that but they also ran nothing like they do with air to water and they would have to back out a 100cc fuel cause of the hotter air. That would make them not worth the extra coin over the s400 turbos. In my opinion anyway.
 
ovrdrvboy said:
My thoughts behind this is 2.5 is growing everywhere so adding that class keeping 2.6 current then growing 3.0 would give a great 3 class show but that's just my opinion
Click to expand...

I like that, and that is where this will end up, draft copies are always adjusted, but not sure what we can do for 3.0- we already have virtually the same 3.0 rules across the country..unless something changed in Illinois that I missed, which is possible.

Personally, I would hate to see the 3.0 go with cut tires...
 
scott 06 said:
i talked very highly of the 2.6nadm rules to alot of people because they req full interior to keep gutted trucks out it was a really good class,
Click to expand...

We appreciate that Scott, and yes it was a good class, but trying to keep even part of the country on the same page, was like herding greased cats. :soap:


We will adjust our original rules(2012) to make sure we don't keep guys out who built for PPL and 25 other clubs with different quirks, and go from there. No ODL for NADM 2.6 in 2013.
Thanks for the input fellas!
 
Sledpuller said:
We appreciate that Scott, and yes it was a good class, but trying to keep even part of the country on the same page, was like herding greased cats. :soap:


We will adjust our original rules(2012) to make sure we don't keep guys out who built for PPL and 25 other clubs with different quirks, and go from there. No ODL for NADM 2.6 in 2013.
Thanks for the input fellas!
Click to expand...

WTF???? Don't be scared. Just do it and everybody else will follow!!! lol!
 
Sledpuller said:
I would hate to see the 3.0 go with cut tires...
Click to expand...

Just wondering your thoughts on this? The current 2.6 makes enough power to hook a cut tire and the 3.0 boys should be beyond them. I would think it would be a good way to differentiate the two (especially from a fan perspective). Running 2.6 on a single DOT and allowing a cut in 3.0 would create a definitive distinction (and I'm willing to bet help pullers decide which way to go).

Or are you worried guys will think 3.0 is out of reach? Currently they can jump up with DOT's and beefed 1 ton drivelines (that they already have) and compete, but cuts will add yet another cost to be competitive and almost require open drivelines (vs. upgraded 1 tons). Cheaper in the long run for a guy building a truck, but a tough monetary pill to swallow for a guy jumping.
 
ILLINOISRAM said:
I heard that but they also ran nothing like they do with air to water and they would have to back out a 100cc fuel cause of the hotter air. That would make them not worth the extra coin over the s400 turbos. In my opinion anyway.
Click to expand...

This coming from someone that has never even ran a hx60 without or with a a/w setup. A spearco a/a does a better job than what many run for a a2w setup.
 
Sledpuller said:
We appreciate that Scott, and yes it was a good class, but trying to keep even part of the country on the same page, was like herding greased cats. :soap:


We will adjust our original rules(2012) to make sure we don't keep guys out who built for PPL and 25 other clubs with different quirks, and go from there. No ODL for NADM 2.6 in 2013.
Thanks for the input fellas!
Click to expand...

Sounds good looking forward to hooking with you this year
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top