Whichever brand you go with, make sure it is a load cell. Inertia dyno's are fun for dyno days where you make a 2 sec sweep and a silly big number, but are lousy for tuning.
I'm sure JSP will be along before too long, with his two cents, as I am sure he did some comprehensive research before he pulled the trigger on his Superflow.
In my dyno experience to this point I have used:
Dynojet (both new load cell and inertia)
Mustang (both single roller and dual)
Land and Sea (inertia)
Dynocom (both portable hub units and a large single roller load cell.)
Dynodynamics (Trailer mounted setup)
Superflow (load cell)
I have 20:1 time on the Mustang to anything else, so I am most comfortable on it, but both the dynojet load cell, and the Dyncom had straight forward interface's for the most part. All of which were very repeatable.
I have run a dynojet inertia at a 3000' asl and again at sea level, two weeks apart with the same truck and same tune. My uncorrected numbers were within 5hp of each other. Obviously this is a very small sample to make any real judgments on, but uncorrected to uncorrected dynojet to dynojet seems repeatable, but it could have just been a fluke too.
I have only made 3 consecutive pulls on a superflow at a dyno day, they were all very repeatable, but have no actual time operating it, and therefore no opinion good or bad
The land and sea I was on was old or rather neglected, the software was horrible, and repeatable was +or- ~20hp at 300hp... Unless there have been some major improvements it would not be a consideration for me.