Just to clear some misinformation:
In terms of repeatability and accuracy, you can't beat an inertia unit. They use simple mathematics to calculate a power figure. They don't have a load cell so don't suffer thermal drift or variation, they also don't need calibration
Though we must remember no chassis dyno offers fully accurate figures, they all rely on that massively variable factor that comes in the shape of a rubber tyre.
Obviously you stated you will be tuning, so this requires load holding capability. For high torque such as diesel consider a large single roll as opposed to smaller as used by dynodynamics.
Superflow is cream of the crop.
Any chassis dyno repeatability is open to interpretation given strapping methods and forces vary from operator to operator.
Having used, designed, and fabricated various dynos. ..for just power runs, inertia gets my vote everytime. There is no negating the need for load holding for tuning purposes, which I guess the OP needs
Ashley I financed mine for 4 years and 4'ish percent with zero down. The finance place dynojet directed me toward wanted 10% down and 9% interest....
Sent from my iPhone
Repeatably from one run to the next on the same dyno same time....
I have heard some guys say the 224 over heats pretty easy. Let me know if you find that to be true
Where did you find that financing? Ill order one tomorrow on those terms.
I have heard some guys say the 224 over heats pretty easy. Let me know if you find that to be true
Broke ground Saturday, in their instructions for pit digging they have an optional vent tube to cool the brake. Fleece has this one in the ground and I've never heard them gripe about over heating...
The loan was through Joe Penn's personal bank with him as a guarantor, otherwise I was coughing up 10% down...
Sent from my iPhone
Just to clear some misinformation:
In terms of repeatability and accuracy, you can't beat an inertia unit. They use simple mathematics to calculate a power figure. They don't have a load cell so don't suffer thermal drift or variation, they also don't need calibration
The above proves that you have absolutely no understanding of the difference between repeatability and accuracy.
And I love how you say it "calculates a power figure". Proves my point exactly.
Inertia dynos are cheap and repeatable. They also don't load the engine anything like a drag race or a sled pull.....so whatever "power figure" it spits out is just that. A figure.
My thought on an inertia, they are only useful if the vehicle that's on it weighs the same or less then the rollers for turbo charged motors. N/A and super chargers, I don't think it matters as much.
I can see inertia dynos being more useful if the drum is sufficiently heavy so that the acceleration rate of the vehicle is in the same ballpark as what you'd see on a racetrack.
....which is something the load cell unit can be programmed to do exactly.