I'm not following.....you got curves from a DD dyno that you didn't drive on ("no need")?
???
I'm not following.....you got curves from a DD dyno that you didn't drive on ("no need")?
???
The above proves that you have absolutely no understanding of the difference between repeatability and accuracy.
And I love how you say it "calculates a power figure". Proves my point exactly.
Inertia dynos are cheap and repeatable. They also don't load the engine anything like a drag race or a sled pull.....so whatever "power figure" it spits out is just that. A figure.
So an energy based figure derived from time taken to accelerate a known mass with known geometry, isn't a calculation?
And road load simulations are a different discussion to obtaining a power figure. We were talking about the latter, making the former irrelevant.
We have a Dynocom DC1800X. It's worked very well. Loads the trucks down and is very affordable. Excellent quality parts and easy to use software. (866) 436-3966 talk to Allison. Tell her Dan from Dan's Diesel referred you.
It's totally a calculation, and that's all it is. Show me a high end analytical technique anywhere in the scientific world that has no standard to test against....
Load cell dynos actually measure torque directly, can be calibrated using simple weights.
Ever seen a inertia engine dyno? Hmmm....