Actually Gene it is 825hp at 4000rpms and it is a load dyno. This was making a peak of 52psi and dropped to 42psi at 4000rpms were it pegs the 60psi on the pulling track. It probably makes more power than this under full load of the sled. If you don't think it is what we say it is, come pull agianst it yourself and find out the hard way. I really think you need to get out more becuase you would not be talking like this, oh wait I keep forgetting who you are. Carry on Gene...
Mark you get awfully defensive, you posted the chart, I'm asking questions. If you dont like to answer questions, don't be bragging.
Dyno Jest are historically famous for giving high HP low tq numbers on Diesels, just wondering what you've done to increase the accuracy of its shortcomings.
Now, that said you also said this:
"....NADM legal turbo(not even my biggest one out there) and it dynoed 911RWHP 1539ftlbs!
It only dynoed 785rwhp 13xxftlbs on a true 66mm turbo.
It will most like be 850ish range on
our new turbo rules...."
So with YOUR new turbo rules in place you shaved 61 WHOLE HP off the old turbo rules.
61!!!!!!61
You will not see 61 HP on the track, boys. NADM said the protrusion rule would be lucky to shave 75 hp. Looks like we were right. But I need to get out more.
I would bet Danville Performance will find the 61 HP the new rule lost by 2012, dont you agree Mark?Or sooner..
I'm not changing rules for 61 HP.
When you are serious about cutting the class back, and not just selling another turbo, let me know.